When was electronic tagging introduced

While its uses may be diverse, EM is not a panacea or universally appropriate tool in criminal justice. Nonetheless, with judicious use, EM has the capacity to enhance public and judicial confidence in community sentences. Excellent risk assessment practices, including visiting the property, are imperative to ensuring appropriate decision-making about using electronically monitored home curfews, considering the individual, family or other members of the household and, where appropriate, victims of crime.

Assessments are usually done by criminal justice social workers. Risks of criminal and harmful behaviour such as domestic abuse are encompassed in these assessments. Not enough is known about the implications of diversity in uses of EM.

There is no one approach fits all policy Graham and McIvor, EM can also be used in gender-responsive ways or as a feature of gender-responsive service provision. More research is needed in this area. Finally, the prospect of expanding uses of EM carry workload and resource implications for community justice workforces. Introducing GPS EM and using it with specific groups of offenders necessitates commensurate capacity to actively monitor large volumes of data, and alert police and other criminal justice professionals to respond swiftly to violations in high risk cases.

Internationally well-regarded uses of EM in the Netherlands and Nordic countries are well resourced, public service-led approaches which involve probation officers devoting significant amounts of time to supervision and support of each monitored person. Scotland has the opportunity to advance its use of EM to build on existing simple and relatively stable uses, which can be more creative and innovative Scottish Government, a; Graham and McIvor, Social workers have a key role to play in ensuring that they are aware of the capacity of EM technologies and can harness them to increase the effectiveness of community supervision and achieve other relevant penal aims.

Comments represent the views of reviewers and do not necessarily represent those of their organisations. Iriss would like to thank the reviewers for taking the time to reflect and comment on this publication. Don't miss out on our latest news, resources and events.

Join our mailing list. Skip to main navigation. Improving lives through knowledge, evidence and innovation. Breadcrumb Home Resources Insights Electronic monitoring in the criminal justice syst Electronic monitoring in the criminal justice system. Insight Published on 10 Oct Electronic monitoring technologies There are three main types of EM tagging technology, each of which has differing capabilities, strengths and limitations. In the Scottish criminal justice system, EM may be used with adults aged 16 years and older as a means of monitoring compliance with different types of orders and licences: A Restriction of Liberty Order RLO , which is a community sentence authorised by the court A Home Detention Curfew HDC licence, which is a form of early release from prison, authorised by the Scottish Prison Service As a condition of a Drug Treatment and Testing Order, authorised by the court As a condition of a parole licence, authorised by the Parole Board for Scotland As a restricted movement requirement imposed following breach of a Community Payback Order CPO , authorised by the court Assessments of risk and the suitability of a property for EM are usually conducted in advance by criminal justice social workers to inform decision-making.

Total caseload. Electronic monitoring caseload Year Electronic monitoring caseload 31 Mar 13, 31 Mar 10, 31 Mar 10, 31 Mar 11, 31 Mar 11, 31 Mar 12, 31 Mar 14, As a condition of court bail. Court sentence.

Thousands of criminals in England and Wales will be tagged with GPS trackers to allow authorities to trace them 24 hours a day. Currently, electronic tags are linked to a box at a fixed address, such as an offender's home, with alerts generated if they are not there at certain hours.

But the new location tags will track a person's movements wherever they go. Justice Secretary David Gauke said the tags will better protect victims of domestic abuse or stalking. Standard electronic tags - largely used to enforce a curfew or house arrest - issue an alert if the person wearing the tag is not present at a particular address during the hours they are meant to be.

Around 60, offenders currently wear these standard tags in England and Wales. The GPS tags can be used to create a no-go zone, check an offender is attending a rehabilitation programme, monitor an offender's behaviour, or ban someone from going within a certain distance of an address - such as a fellow criminal's or victim's home. Officials estimate that around 4, people will be GPS-tagged in a year.

The early release of 57 inmates tomorrow from prisons across England and Wales will mark the start to what is to become the world's most ambitious electronic tagging scheme. The Home Detention Curfew programme will eventually cover the early release each year of 30, prisoners, whose curfews will be monitored by private security companies.

A further 60 inmates will be released on Friday to be followed by next Monday. All will have to go through a rigorous "risk assessment" by the prison and the probation services.

There will be no mass walkouts through prison gates tomorrow as the inmates are released in ones or twos from 37 prisons. The numbers on the scheme will build up gradually until April, when it is expected that more than 4, will be wearing the electronic ankle tags. The adoption of the scheme in this country follows three trials in Manchester, Norfolk and Reading involving 2, inmates. Home Office officials said yesterday that the first prisoners released will be among the "safest bets".