Which country is sinking

New Orleans. New Orleans is vulnerable to rising sea levels. As recently as the s, just a third of New Orleans was below sea level. When Katrina hit in , that number went up to half.

The city is vulnerable to rising sea levels because it was built on loose soil and was positioned so close to on the coast. Combined with its sinking -- scientists have found it to be falling at a rate of 0.

Beijing's high groundwater usage is one reason why researchers say the city is sinking. A study from showed that Beijing is sinking by as much as 4 inches 10 centimeters in some areas per year.

Researchers said the cause of the sinking was depleting groundwater, similar to the situation in Jakarta and Houston. Beijing, which is not a coastal city, relies heavily on groundwater as its main source of water.

The water has been accumulating over many years, but its extraction has dried up the soil and caused it to compact -- leading to the sinking. Researchers believe that Washington will sink more than 6 inches in the next years. Washington is one of the most important cities in the US -- and it's also sinking. While the organization concentrates on rebuilding from past damage, it also advises on how to prepare for the future by better equipping communities for the threats they face.

Many communities are attempting to tackle the sinking problem locally, as well. Montgomery County in Houston is debating on how subsidence should factor into planning, while the CLEO Institute in Miami is involving coastal communities in conservation and education efforts while helping underrepresented communities advocate for better solutions.

Although awareness and proactive measures may help mitigate further damage to the cities listed above, efforts to protect people already impacted by the sinking state of their cities will be ongoing. Lindsey, Rebecca. Updated January 25, Gebremichael, E. Erkens, G, et al. Updated November 24, Tibetts, John H. Oppenheimer, M. Harris, Gardiner. Published March 28, Kasmarek, Mark C. Kimmelman, Michael. Published December 21, Bock, Yehuda, et al.

Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Use precise geolocation data. Select personalised content. Create a personalised content profile. Measure ad performance. Select basic ads. Create a personalised ads profile. And they helped save complex international climate talks from collapse.

These success of these countries offers a broader lesson: no one nation can solve a problem as complex as climate change alone, but together bands of nations can make a difference. And that lesson applies to a host of global challenges, from emerging diseases to international terrorism and the spread of nuclear weapons. As states around the world turn inward in response to rising populism, the tiny island nations are showing that international institutions remain not only relevant but also necessary to address the toughest challenges of our generation.

That test is anything but theoretical for the bellwether states that dot the Pacific. The IPCC study released last fall suggests that some may not survive if temperature increase tops 1.

In mid-May, leaders of island nations from across the Pacific gathered in Fiji to plot their next big step: coordinating a push to make developed countries commit to aggressive new targets for reducing their emissions at a global climate summit to be convened by the U. The goal: make the world respond to the urgency of climate change. If they fail, they will likely not be the last to go. But not all successes are created equal. Indeed, it may be their loss that finally rouses the world to the stakes of the challenge.

The story of how a few tiny Pacific nations joined hands to shape the Paris Agreement begins in September , in a bland conference room at the Grand Pacific Hotel in the Fijian capital of Suva. During a three-day meeting in advance of the Paris climate talks, government officials and civil-society leaders from 15 Pacific nations drew up a list of what they wanted out of the approaching negotiations. The goals included a halt to new coal mines in countries that still supported the industry, backing for research and development on issues facing the region and increased funding to help poor countries prepare for extreme weather.

One demand was paramount: any new global climate pact, the leaders agreed, had to aim to stop temperatures from rising more than 1. The gap may not sound like much. But the leaders gathered in Suva had known for years it could determine whether their countries survive or sink. Perched just a few feet above sea level, several countries are on the brink of losing their entire land mass. For those at higher elevations, the threat is nearly as dire.

A country can survive only so many storms whose costs match annual GDP. Emerging from their September confab, the Pacific countries had not only a commitment to 1. In the months that followed, the islands joined with other vulnerable countries to pressure their peers. Because any country can veto international climate deals, such a move would have doomed the talks.

Optimism gave way as the negotiations stalled. For days, the talks centered on the usual disagreements dividing the geopolitical heavyweights. The big developing countries wanted the developed world to acknowledge it was responsible for the bulk of climate change and face tougher standards to address it.

Please consider making a contribution to Vox today to help us keep our work free for all. Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.

By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies. Why Jakarta is sinking. Reddit Pocket Flipboard Email. Next Up In Video.